RESOLVING COLOR DOMINANCE...
4/19/2013 8:49:58 PM
"Hollyhock Garden", 18x24", oil on canvas panel
Yesterday, in helping a student better understand the variables of using color as it applies to dominance, I said, “dominance does not mean exclusion”. What I meant by that is that a painting should have color dominance (either warm or cool) but that does not exclude the possibility of the opposite temperature being included in the painting in subordinate passages. It’s been my experience that many students, new to color theory, misunderstand the use of the word dominance. To the inexperienced, dominance may mean that a full palette of both warm and cool colors may not be used in the same painting. This is simply not true.
If you look at my painting “Hollyhock Garden” above, you’ll see that the dominant temperature throughout is cool (primarily in the green family). Look again, and you’ll see that I used a warm red (Cad. Red Light) as an accent within the color-filled cool red flowers. In addition, I lightly scumbled a warm yellow (a mixture of Cad. Yel. Deep and Yellow Ochre) over the background trees on the left to suggest warm sunshine filtering down among the trees. This use of the opposite temperature to the cool dominance of the entire painting, in miniscule amounts, created a contrasting tension…thus; the painting visually pops and has interest for the eye.
If you are having trouble with temperature usage let me know your concerns by contacting me via the "Contact" page on this website. I will try to address them in future blog posts.





